<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.enterprisearchitecture.management/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Trends%3AIntelligent_Business_Process_Management</id>
		<title>Trends:Intelligent Business Process Management - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.enterprisearchitecture.management/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Trends%3AIntelligent_Business_Process_Management"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.enterprisearchitecture.management/index.php?title=Trends:Intelligent_Business_Process_Management&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-07-05T15:00:44Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.enterprisearchitecture.management/index.php?title=Trends:Intelligent_Business_Process_Management&amp;diff=5214&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin: Created page with &quot;{{DISPLAYTITLE: Intelligent Business Process Management}} == The Intelligent Business Process Management (iBPM) Trend == Recent evolution towards iBPMS strategies and technolo...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.enterprisearchitecture.management/index.php?title=Trends:Intelligent_Business_Process_Management&amp;diff=5214&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2017-01-10T14:22:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;{{DISPLAYTITLE: Intelligent Business Process Management}} == The Intelligent Business Process Management (iBPM) Trend == Recent evolution towards iBPMS strategies and technolo...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: Intelligent Business Process Management}}&lt;br /&gt;
== The Intelligent Business Process Management (iBPM) Trend ==&lt;br /&gt;
Recent evolution towards iBPMS strategies and technology is the inclusion of more sophisticated reporting capabilities within the BPM environment itself. This is both enabled and in many way necessitated by the greater flexibility of the architectures introduced with the BPM suites that provide BPM Phase Two capabilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With these environments, the ability to support non-sequential, goal-driven models is greatly increased, requiring more feedback (reporting) to enable successful execution of this type of less deterministic process models. With few exceptions, reporting on process events and business performance was previously done only after a process had executed, or otherwise within a separate environment disjointed from the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This obviously prevented any opportunity to impact the direction or a process, but was based on a limitation of the management process as well as system and software architectures. Specifically with regard to BPM, process models were most commonly defined as proprietary structures, and in many cases compiled into software. Thus, changes either required bringing down and recompiling an application, or were otherwise limited to discrete points in the process (such as exceptions and yes/no decision points).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Solution Trends]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>